You can't have an energy policy that means you can only have a bath when the wind blows.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We haven't had a good energy policy in this country for decades and we're trying to get one.
Conservation may be a sign of personal virtue, but it is not a sufficient basis for a sound, comprehensive energy policy.
I am a fan of an all-of-the-above energy strategy, and I certainly support wind as a large part of that goal.
There is an incredible renewable energy resource off both coasts of this country - wind and tidal energy that can power our economy, create good paying jobs and reduce greenhouse gas pollution.
There isn't a single windmill owner in Holland who doesn't have a second job, for when there is no wind.
Wind and solar power are land-intensive, a green sin, but not energy-dense, and affordable only when heavily subsidized. And wind power must be supplemented with hydrocarbons for reliability.
Baths are my favorite thing. I can have two, three a day.
I strongly support an 'all-of-the-above' energy policy that includes additional development of wind, clean coal, and bio-fuels.
We didn't wait for the renewable heat incentives to come into place; we wanted to be first to provide consumers with alternative ways to heat their homes.
China has an almost infinite need for energy, and frankly, the world would be better off if much of that need goes in the direction of wind power.
No opposing quotes found.