If you're talking about nuclear physics, I have to defer to the next guy. But if you're talking about football, I don't have to take a back seat to anyone.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Football isn't nuclear physics, but it's not so simple that you can make it simple. It takes some explaining to get it across.
Boxing is a great example of it, but in football, sometimes you're taking greater hits than boxers. When you have one man going full speed against another man, and those heads are colliding, it's just the fact of science you're going to have results.
Politics is a lot tougher than physics.
Nuclear physics is interesting but it is unlikely to help society.
Although important nuclear physics work was to go on in laboratories such as ours had become - and we had to cut down to a lower energy group - it was not fundamentally opening up new insights on the structure of matter. That required you to be in a higher league.
Physics is becoming too difficult for the physicists.
It is just physics - who can argue with Newton and the first law of thermodynamics?
Actually, I'm for football. But I'm for intelligent football that enhances us rather than football that steals away who we are.
I have a problem with telling jokes about physics. Quite often the audience have no idea what you are talking about and, to be honest, I don't know what I'm talking about either.
I deal with football from a realistic, logical point of view.