My feeling, of course, is that it's ludicrous to try to prove God's existence by science. God has nothing to do with science. God has all to do with soul, and who can explain that?
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
As a scientist, I don't believe science will ever discover whether God exists. Nor do I believe religion will ever prove it.
No doubt it is true that science cannot study God, but it hardly follows that God had to keep a safe distance from everything that scientists want to study.
My view is that science only has something to say about a very particular notion of God, which goes by the name of 'god of the gaps'.
Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof.
A science which does not bring us nearer to God is worthless.
Unfortunately, science cannot be reduced to short, catchy phrases. And if this is all that the general public can comprehend, it's no wonder that we spend so much of our time in the interminable debate about belief in God, or lack thereof.
We should provide the meaning of the universe in the meaning of our own lives. So I think science doesn't necessarily have to get in the way of kind of spiritual fulfillment.
God created the world; the laws of nature were created by God. True science tries to find out what God put in the world. The trouble is where scientists speculate about theology and they don't know what they're talking about because they weren't there. They can't speculate about the origins of life because they weren't there.
People think of science as rolling back the mystery of God. I look at science as slowly creeping toward the mystery of God.
The purpose of this study is to offer a logical, practical, pragmatic proof of the existence of God from a purely scientific perspective.