Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
My feeling, of course, is that it's ludicrous to try to prove God's existence by science. God has nothing to do with science. God has all to do with soul, and who can explain that?
Science has faith. We make postulates. We can't prove those postulates, but we have faith in them.
For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.
I hold that the mark of a genuine idea is that its possibility can be proved, either a priori by conceiving its cause or reason, or a posteriori when experience teaches us that it is in fact in nature.
In science, nothing is ever 100% proven.
There's a lot of faith expressed by scientists about science. It's kind of an act of faith that science is a good thing. We don't know that for sure. We may not know that millions of years from now.
I have issues with anyone who tries to claim that science is unworkable - creationists who deny evidence for past history, yet are happy to benefit from the products of the methodology that they otherwise deny.
Unlike science, creationism cannot predict anything, and it cannot provide satisfactory answers about the past.
Creation is absolute, 100 percent scientific proof that there was a Creator.
As a scientist, I don't believe science will ever discover whether God exists. Nor do I believe religion will ever prove it.