So many differing opinions and philosophies... are rarely housed under the roof of a single magazine.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There are a significant number of people who appreciate what we do, and most of them gravitate to Analog because this is where they can find it. The other magazines tend to share their audiences, which may result in each of them having a smaller market share.
There are so many magazines and so many editors out there that you have to be different.
A manifesto is different from a magazine.
Most magazines have peak moments. They live on, they do just okay, or they die. 'The New Yorker' has had a very different kind of existence.
The classic rule of thumb is that if you are an intellectual ideological magazine, you do better in opposition than you do if your views are reflected by people in power.
One of the things I regret is that magazines now are so lifestyle-orientated that the opportunity to do bigger projects is gone. This is a serious misjudgment on the part of magazine editors.
Magazines at some point become hostage to their own success.
I have been fortunate that publications like the 'New York Times' and 'The Wall Street Journal' have allowed me to share some of my opinions with a wider audience.
I don't really read magazines that much. I read comic books.
Objective journalism and an opinion column are about as similar as the Bible and Playboy magazine.