I think as an investigative reporter I had tough standards, but I don't think of myself as a tough person.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I guess, as a reporter, I always thought that my biggest strength was that I could get anybody to talk to me. I wasn't the best writer, but I could get people to talk to me.
I was a very bad journalist. Awful. I would just invent everything. If I did an interview, I had a preconception of what that person should say and I would put my words in his mouth.
As someone who has spent a lot of her career as an investigative reporter, I'll confess that a frustration of mine has always been that so much investigative journalism involves a dissection of events in the past.
There have been moments in my career when I've had to be tough and I've had to step up to the plate - but usually that's because a man has underestimated me. But other than that, I wouldn't say I'm a tough person.
I was never a good journalist, because I would make things up. A lot of people frowned on that, which is why I ended up in fiction.
Well, one of the things I discovered in the course of looking back and writing about what I saw in my memory is that I was a closely observant person long before I became a reporter.
I was a lousy journalist. I could never be objective. Sometimes I invented the whole story.
I am the world's worst reporter. I am apt to try too hard to help rather than just document my subjects.
In a very straightforward way, I am a terrible reporter. I'm not someone who can go into a story and not get involved.
I've always thought of myself as a reporter.