Quote

Clearly any film company that makes a film is always going to talk about sequels particularly if they see something as being successful, which Werewolf was.

It's such a strange combination that I'd be unhappy to make anything like that without Landis directing.

There are two ways to write a werewolf novel - you can examine the genre conventions, or you can say, 'What would it be like if I were a werewolf?'

I don't think they knew exactly where they were going with the character, but they lay those stories out ahead of time, so they had some idea where they wanted it to go.

Whether you like it or not, Paris is the beating heart of Western civilisation. It's where it all began and ended.

We have all seen werewolf transformations hundreds of times on screen.

I don't know if it's a failure of imagination on my part, but I'm not going to be writing about Paris in the 1800s. I feel like it would come off as just ludicrously uninformed, even if I did a lot of research.

If I look at it, it's about being able to get lost in New York, to explore the city, to have more personal stories about New York, although some could also take place in Paris.

As far as expense, I think if 'Twilight' does well enough, then we should be able to do the big expensive stuff for the sequels. I mean, we have to have werewolves, there's no way around it. They have to be there.

There was a different ending to 'New Moon' originally. It was a much quieter book. It was very much all in Bella's head.