Clearly any film company that makes a film is always going to talk about sequels particularly if they see something as being successful, which Werewolf was.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
As far as expense, I think if 'Twilight' does well enough, then we should be able to do the big expensive stuff for the sequels. I mean, we have to have werewolves, there's no way around it. They have to be there.
Sequels are not done for the audience or cinema or the filmmakers. It's for the distributor. The film becomes a brand.
If you think about it, a lot of great horror films have bad sequels just because the market demands you to make the other one right away. Thank God no one in the 'Evil Dead' family thinks that way.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.
I think sequels are fine if there's a story, so I think when there is a property that is worthy of a sequel, it could very well happen!
A lot of people ask for sequels, but what they really want is just to know the characters are happy and safe.
In 'Scream 2', they have this discussion about how sequels always suck.
While I always thought of making sequels to movies like 'Ghayal,' the filmmakers would almost always veto the idea.
I mean, frankly, I'm not speaking as a representative of Disney or Pixar, I'm speaking as just myself as a filmmaker: I don't go into anything that often thinking about a sequel.
You never know in a movie if it's going to be a sequel, but right now I'm proud of what we produced.
No opposing quotes found.