I think sequels are fine if there's a story, so I think when there is a property that is worthy of a sequel, it could very well happen!
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There's a real danger in doing a sequel. There are some benefits, but that all hinges on how well you execute. Quite frankly, most sequels don't execute well.
I suppose sequels are inevitable for a writer of a certain age.
I don't know if I would do sequels. I almost feel like when I'm done with them, they're going to have to find their own way.
I think sequels should be earned and we won't do it unless the script is better than the first one.
The only reason I would write a sequel is if I were struck by an idea that I felt to be equal to the original. Too many sequels diminish the original.
The only reason ever to make a sequel is to spend more time with the characters that people love: to tell more of their story.
As we all know, sequels can be tricky.
I hate the idea of sequels. I think you should be able to do it in one book.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.
My gut feeling about sequels is that they should be premeditated: You should try to write a trilogy first or at least sketch out a trilogy if you have any faith in your film.