Likewise the leader of any state has to do the same, he has to enforce Shariah firmly, for he will be held in account later in the afterlife if he fails.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Now, a leader must cause things to happen and lives to be affected. Something should move and change. He must see that those under him do not fail. But it should be done in the Lord's way.
He that would govern others, first should be Master of himself.
The only safe ruler is he who has learned to obey willingly.
The man who prefers his country before any other duty shows the same spirit as the man who surrenders every right to the state. They both deny that right is superior to authority.
If the Muslim is Sharia-compliant, that is in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution.
One must always keep one's government under control.
I have no religion, and at times I wish all religions at the bottom of the sea. He is a weak ruler who needs religion to uphold his government; it is as if he would catch his people in a trap.
You need to form a grand coalition, and you need to put your ideological differences aside and work together to focus on people's basic needs. You can't eat sharia.
He who is to be a good ruler must have first been ruled.
If someone is supporting Sharia, that is doing something wrong.