Political art - not always a contradiction in terms - can destroy institutions, or eat away at them.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A lot of politics in art is just institutional critique, which, in my opinion, is not all that political.
I don't understand how any good art could fail to be political.
Art removes boundaries and makes the world brighter. It is the common language for people all over the world. But politics are the opposite completely. Politicians, their very meaning is based on the lines they draw.
Any form of art is political if you make it that way.
Politics is politics; art is art. If you play a political role, you have to stop being an artist.
It does not seem that the contradiction which exists between the aristocratic function of art and the democratic structure of modern society can ever be resolved.
All art is political in the sense that it serves someone's politics.
It is not with architecture that one can disseminate any political ideology.
Art has nothing to do with politics. It is the freest thing in the world.
Art is about play and about transcendent meanings, not reducible to politics.