If the adjustment made by a court can be accepted or not, it will be refused whenever the men can gain more by continuing the strike, with whatever of violence that involves.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It's easy for people to strike if they're not working on a regular basis.
No change can come if those who are impacted the most by discrimination are not willing to stand up for themselves.
For a man to strike any women is most brutal, and I, as well as everyone else, think this far worse than any attempt to shoot, which, wicked as it is, is at least more comprehensible and more courageous.
You can have bans on assault weapons or whatever weapons you wish, and it's not going to protect from a violent person.
At first everyone predicted that it would be impossible to hold these divergent people together, but aside from the skilled men, some of whom belonged to craft unions, comparatively few went back to the mills. And as a whole, the strike was conducted with little violence.
When you have the opportunity, you strike.
Mandatory arbitration clauses I think, more often than not, work to the detriment of working people.
Voting to go on strike is not a decision working people take lightly and is always accompanied by a strong sense of injustice at work. The impact of losing a day's pay is significant, not least for those in the lowest paid jobs who are already on the tightest budgets.
Your strike will not win. You cannot be allowed to succeed.
My job isn't to strike guys out; it's to get them out - sometimes by striking them out.