Companies shouldn't use the law to prevent consumers from doing something legal.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Business owners should not have to choose between violating their faith and violating the law.
Regardless of the industry, antitrust law is meant to benefit consumers - not competitors.
I don't think any business has to give up legal protections in order to simplify. The main consideration is that whatever protection, rights and remedies a corporation wants, they should be put in terms that are understandable to the consumer.
Dominant companies have a special responsibility to ensure that the way they do business doesn't prevent competition... and does not harm consumers and innovation.
The business of America shouldn't be subsidizing business.
I tell them the rules are made by the government. Every firm should comply. It doesn't mean they can't compete.
The federal government should not be in the business of initiating and administering short-term incentive programs designed to shape consumer purchase behavior.
You don't help your enterprise with a policy of protection.
The law does not pretend to punish everything that is dishonest. That would seriously interfere with business.
If we want corporations to act differently, we have to force them to do so through laws that are fully enforced and through penalties higher than the economic benefits of thwarting the laws.