There are differences in the world community. But we have a common interest in a strong multilateral system.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Since I came to the World Bank in 2007, I have argued that we must 'modernize multilateralism.'
Countries are different. They make different choices. We cannot harmonise everything.
It is vital that the World Bank Group continually challenges itself to refresh our development thinking. It is vital that a modernized multilateralism be open to new ideas.
On big issues like war in Iraq, but in many other issues they simply must be multilateral. There's no other way around. You have the instances like the global warming convention, the Kyoto protocol, when the U.S. went its own way.
Is multilateralism nothing more than a dodge for simple inaction?
Back then, a half-a-century ago, the situation was totally different. Economically, we were practically on our knees, and politically, we were still excluded from the community of nations. Today, in this respect, we have a totally different and much more stable basis.
An increasingly multipolar world requires an entirely different kind of U.S. foreign policy: far from being unilateralist, it necessitates a complex form of power-sharing on both a global and regional basis.
International cooperation, multilateralism is indispensable.
Let me let you in on a little secret. There is no such thing as an international community. There are self-maximizing, self-interested states that will push their interests as far as possible.
Community action is as valuable a principle on the international level as it has been domestically.
No opposing quotes found.