Since I came to the World Bank in 2007, I have argued that we must 'modernize multilateralism.'
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It is vital that the World Bank Group continually challenges itself to refresh our development thinking. It is vital that a modernized multilateralism be open to new ideas.
There are differences in the world community. But we have a common interest in a strong multilateral system.
Is multilateralism nothing more than a dodge for simple inaction?
On big issues like war in Iraq, but in many other issues they simply must be multilateral. There's no other way around. You have the instances like the global warming convention, the Kyoto protocol, when the U.S. went its own way.
International cooperation, multilateralism is indispensable.
To claim the World Bank is just an extension of U.S. foreign policy is just wrong.
In an era of global value chains, worldwide sourcing and the never-ending search for new markets, we must be careful to avoid the proliferation of regional standards. A multilateral approach holds wider benefits for more actors.
An increasingly multipolar world requires an entirely different kind of U.S. foreign policy: far from being unilateralist, it necessitates a complex form of power-sharing on both a global and regional basis.
It has been said that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity.
At the World Bank, we are already working with our clients in developing countries to improve their governance systems, collect taxes, fight corruption, and recover stolen assets.
No opposing quotes found.