It's fun to play a character who lives on the edge, who is an ethical and moral mess, and is paying the price for some of his actions.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think it's more fun to play a hero with an edge.
Contemporary audiences are interested in watching characters navigate ethical challenges and moral dilemmas.
I like for there to be a moral, for the character to have gotten something out of the experience.
Sometimes it's a character you want to play or a story you want to tell. Sometimes it's just to pay the bills.
It's always appealing to play a character that has to overcome himself as well as an obstacle. It makes the drama so much deeper.
I like situations that push a character to the edge.
And while I might not always agree with the viewpoint I have to portray, because I play a district attorney, as an actress I can always tell myself that my character is trying to take the moral high ground.
I think a lot of moral debates are not over what is the basis of justice, but who gets a ticket to play in the game.
I like the idea of a character that you wanna like even though you know he's making immoral choices throughout the film.
A lot of the time, a moral compass is all that separates a hero from being a villain; otherwise, the two are very much the same. Both are generally the richest and most complex characters, and they get to have all the fun. I guess it's those types of roles that I ultimately gravitate towards.
No opposing quotes found.