I think a lot of moral debates are not over what is the basis of justice, but who gets a ticket to play in the game.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The simplest way of understanding justice is giving people what they deserve. This idea goes back to Aristotle. The real difficulty begins with figuring out who deserves what and why.
In the end I think theatre has only one subject: justice.
Justice is conscience, not a personal conscience but the conscience of the whole of humanity. Those who clearly recognize the voice of their own conscience usually recognize also the voice of justice.
Justice is a certain rectitude of mind whereby a man does what he ought to do in the circumstances confronting him.
Justice is a temporary thing that must at last come to an end; but the conscience is eternal and will never die.
It's fun to play a character who lives on the edge, who is an ethical and moral mess, and is paying the price for some of his actions.
Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice.
Justice in the extreme is often unjust.
Justice is the sum of all moral duty.
To argue about justice is unavoidably to argue about virtues, about substantive moral and even spiritual questions.