To say that a work of art is good, but incomprehensible to the majority of men, is the same as saying of some kind of food that it is very good but that most people can't eat it.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Art is not in some far-off place. A work of art is the expression of a man's whole personality, sensibility and ability.
Not all art is great; most of it's rubbish.
A work of art is one through which the consciousness of the artist is able to give its emotions to anyone who is prepared to receive them. There is no such thing as bad art.
It's kind of not about the quality of the art, as much as this is what I love doing and I'd have a worse time doing anything else. That's kind of as far as I think in terms of philosophy.
The work of art is always unfaithful to its creator... Art lays at a higher level; it says something more, and almost always, it says something different from what the artist wanted to say.
I mean, art for art's sake is ridiculous. Art is for the sake of one's needs.
I really think there's no difference between an art piece made by a man and one made by a woman. Is it a good art piece or a bad art piece? Of course, if you're female, you're maybe dealing with different issues.
Art expresses man.
Art is the right hand of Nature. The latter has only given us being, the former has made us men.
Art is good, bad, boring, ugly, useful to us or not.