If one is seriously interested in preventing reproductive cloning, one must stop the process before it starts.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.
I would not want to see any relaxation of the law prohibiting human cloning.
Human cloning is coming.
We're not interested in cloning the Michael Jordans and Michael Jacksons of the world, but rather assisting infertile couples that deserve the right to have a biological child to have one.
The argument has been made in Congress that it is slippery slope if you allow therapeutic, what people people are calling therapeutic cloning, then you will get reproductive cloning.
Many other countries have already banned human cloning, and there are efforts at the UN to make such a ban universal.
I think we can allow the therapeutic uses of nuclear transplant technology, which we call cloning, without running the danger of actually having live human beings born.
We're not really under pressure to deliver a cloned baby to this world. What we are under pressure to do is to deliver a cloned baby that is a healthy one.
Certainly I see no reason why society should prevent grieving parents from having a baby cloned from the cells of a dead child if they wish.
There is absolutely no doubt about it, and I may not be the one that does it, but the cloned child is coming. There is absolutely no way that it will not happen.
No opposing quotes found.