Quote

I would not want to see any relaxation of the law prohibiting human cloning.

Humans are something very different from animals, and the numbers required to get cloning to work in animals are completely prohibitory with humans.

The bill would ban human cloning, and any attempts at human cloning, for both reproductive purposes and medical research. Also forbidden is the importing of cloned embryos or products made from them.

Human cloning is coming.

I take the view that anything you can do to relieve suffering or improve human health will usually be widely accepted by the public - that is to say, if cloning actually turned out to be solving some problems and was useful to people, I think it would be accepted.

While that amendment failed, human cloning continues to advance and the breakthrough in this unethical and morally questionable science is around the corner.

Cloning, wow. Who would have thought? There should be a list of people who can and cannot clone themselves.

I think we can allow the therapeutic uses of nuclear transplant technology, which we call cloning, without running the danger of actually having live human beings born.

We're not interested in cloning the Michael Jordans and Michael Jacksons of the world, but rather assisting infertile couples that deserve the right to have a biological child to have one.

There is a pent-up demand from people who want to clone their dead children.