A good argument, like a good dialogue, is always a proof of life, but I'd much rather go and read a book.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
What I look for in any book is an argument, based on evidence, that changes the way I think about something important.
I think of life as a good book. The further you get into it, the more it begins to make sense.
The difficult part in an argument is not to defend one's opinion but rather to know it.
I should have known better. Pro-life arguments are now based on scientific evidence and the pro-choice arguments are not. That is a cultural, historical fact.
Argue with anything else, but don't argue with your own nature.
A lot of good arguments are spoiled by some fool who knows what he is talking about.
When a thing is true, there is no need to use any arguments to substantiate it.
Arguments, like children, should be like the subject that begets them.
I've learned that I have to be happy with creating discussion and debate and that I shouldn't be trying to write a book that appeals to the consensus.
The only way to get the best of an argument is to avoid it.