Quote

It's awesome that you have a female CFO and a female GC, but if you look at the investing partners, and it's 15 dudes, I do think those people are going to get left behind if they don't get with where the world is going.

There is still a perception that the way women are isn't necessarily what you need for the powerhouse start-ups.

Every company I know is looking for more women at the table. Every board is looking for more women at the table. There's a reason why men want to understand the challenges women face, address them, because then they're going to be better hirers, attracters and retainers of women.

Women like myself, CEOs, can pave the way for more women to get to the top.

I really think we need more women to lean into their careers and to be really dedicated to staying in the work force.

It seems to me that women have made an awful lot of progress, but they probably remain underrepresented at the highest levels of most organizations, for a variety of reasons. And it's probably going to take a long time to change that.

Research shows that women at that mid level tend to get promoted based on performance, and men tend to get promoted based on potential.

We have been suckered into believing that, because there are more men at the top than women at the top, that this is a result of discrimination against women. That's been the misconception. It's all about trade-offs. You earn more money, you usually sacrifice something at home.

Some companies are already investing in women and thereby betting on a brighter future - for a workforce just waiting to blossom, for emerging economies whose development depends on this new talent, and, of course, for their own financial growth.

Much of the demand for women in combat comes from female officers who are eager for medals and promotions.