The Supreme Court told me that I should have filed a complaint within six months of the company's first decision to pay me less even though I didn't know about it for nearly two decades.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Unfortunately, no matter how frivolous the lawsuit, you still, of course, have to pay people to defend you on it.
But the courts have dismissed the lawsuits against me and Lee Brown.
If you're hit with a lawsuit that's untrue and the reasons you're hit with it aren't clear to you, there's a very big inclination on people's part to want to take responsibility for it - that this must be happening because I'm a terrible person, I did something, and I'm getting repaid for it.
They rushed to move it forward, uh, and then a lawsuit was filed and we spent many months litigating, rather than trying to come up with legislation and move forward on that front.
And as soon as I did the research, I realized the law seemed to be on my side and I filed the suit.
It causes me great pain to sue the company I work for. Nevertheless, I had to do it. Suffice it to say, there's a dispute and I believe I haven't been given what is mine.
I have decided not to appeal the ruling that took my law license. My accusers, the Board of Supervisors, once again have fired my lawyers, ensuring I cannot properly defend myself or my anti-corruption efforts.
I would rather have not gone through any of the litigation that I've had to go through.
Know how to effectively voice a complaint or make a claim at a retail store.
I am basically a complainer and all the grounds for complaint have been swept out from under me.