It is obvious that anything a scientist discovers or invents is based on previous discoveries and inventions. The same applies to the arts.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Science is to find something unknown, while invention is to make something new out of the known theory.
We will always have more to discover, more to invent, more to understand and that's much closer to art and literature than any science.
There is a great difference between discoveries and inventions. With discoveries, one can always be skeptical, and many surprises can take place. In the case of inventions, surprises can really only occur for people who have not had anything to do with it.
I learned that the first technology appeared in the form of stone tools, 2.6 million years ago. First entertainment comes evidence from flutes that are 35,000 years old. And evidence for first design comes 75,000 years old - beads. And you can do the same with your genes and track them back in time.
The great discoveries are usually obvious.
I think the intuitive processes of discovery are the same, very much the same, in the arts as in the sciences.
I'm more interested in what I discover than what I invent.
Nearly all inventions are not recognised for their positive side either when they're made. So, for example, scientists didn't go out to design a CD machine: they designed a laser. But we got all sorts of things from a laser which we never remotely imagined, and we're still finding things for a laser to do.
Inventions are rarely just a sudden bright idea. Even if they are, they usually have antecedents in the form of pieces of the idea... Piecing these things together gives one a sense of where inventions come from, and that's interesting.
Art and science have so much in common - the process of trial and error, finding something new and innovative, and to experiment and succeed in a breakthrough.
No opposing quotes found.