I love the characters not knowing everything and the reader knowing more than them. There's more mischief in that and more room for seriousness, too.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I am a firm believer that a good plot makes for a fun enough read, but it's not what binds us. If we don't care about the characters, we won't care - not in a lasting way - about what's happening to them.
It's funny, because readers think they want the characters to be blissfully happy, but it makes it kind of boring for the reader.
I believe the most intricate plot won't matter much to readers if they don't care about the characters, especially in a series. So I try to focus hard on making each character, whether villain or hero, have an interesting flaw that readers can relate to.
I'm hopefully making the reader feel a lot about the characters and then about their own life.
When you think of a great twist or a red herring or a way of misdirecting the reader, it is good, but you know that they are just tricks at the end of the day, and the way to keep interest is to write characters that people care about.
The characters are always the focal point of a book for me, whether I'm writing or reading. I may enjoy a book that has an intriguing mystery or a good plot, but to become one of my real favorites, it has to have great characters.
I care more about making sure the story is correct and the characters are behaving in character than I do about the individual jokes.
I love to start characters in a place where you think you know them. We can make all kinds of assumptions about them and think they have no redeeming qualities, but like everyone, they're complex.
I always tell my students to complicate your characters: never make it easy for the reader. Nobody is ever one thing. That's what makes characters compelling.
I love characters who are clever and smart, and you have to run to catch up with. I think there's something very appealing and rather heroic in that.
No opposing quotes found.