But if I have a lot of imagination, I could tell myself whatever I wanted, you know. I handle myself quite well. I'm kind of fascist with myself, you know. There's no discussion. There is an order. You follow it.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
My imagination functions much better when I don't have to speak to people.
Mine is not an autonomous imagination.
I don't have any outside view of myself, and if I did, I would probably be creatively inhibited. I just write in the way that I write.
I'm not such a fan of imagination. If you're alive to details, they oftentimes suggest a richer or deeper imaginative line than you would have imagined.
I'm not trying to be coy or manipulative or Machiavellian, I want to spark people's imaginations.
I know how fiction matters to me, because if I want to express myself, I have to make up a story. Some people call it imagination. To me, it's not imagination. It's just a way of watching.
Usually I say I have no imagination.
I don't have a great imagination to share something with you that you don't know, so it's about interpreting things - a dialogue.
I'm not playing myself. It's a symbolic situation, where I want to introduce a fascist behind the table. I couldn't have had anybody else do that; for it to be successful, I had to do it myself.
I'm kind of fascist with myself, you know.