I'd be a terrible journalist. I wouldn't want to pry; I just don't have that nature.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I became a journalist partly so that I wouldn't ever have to rely on the press for my information.
I don't think, as a journalist, I'd ever get a story written. I'd probably spend five years researching it, and by the time I'd finish it, no one would be interested in it anymore.
I don't think I ever wanted to be a journalist - I was more interested in what comes from being a journalist.
I would never let myself knock out a journalist.
I'd gotten myself into a kind of journalism that wasn't really compatible with rearing an infant. I'd been a foreign correspondent for a long time and had this subspecialty in covering catastrophes. It had spoiled me a little because you have a tremendous amount of autonomy, and I couldn't really see being an editor in an office.
I was never a good journalist, because I would make things up. A lot of people frowned on that, which is why I ended up in fiction.
I'm not strong-willed enough or unkind enough... or maybe simply not wise enough to tell a journalist that a subject is out of bounds.
There's never any time I think I'm a real journalist, because I don't have any of the qualifications or the intentions for that.
I was a very bad journalist. Awful. I would just invent everything. If I did an interview, I had a preconception of what that person should say and I would put my words in his mouth.
I'd never compromise my position as a journalist by having a friendly relationship with a politician.
No opposing quotes found.