If commercialization is putting my art on a shirt so that a kid who can't afford a $30,000 painting can buy one, then I'm all for it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I have respect for those who make money at art and do it well and smartly, because that commercial aspect keeps the world going and running, in a sense.
One of the smartest things Kickstarter has done, in my opinion, is give people a great shopping experience related to the arts, that funds the arts. In essence, they've gotten people to pay $200 for a t-shirt plus the feeling of participation in another artist's endeavor.
People want to make a distinction between what's commercial and what's art.
I think it would be a good thing in the creative community if there was less embarrassment of this word 'commercial' because that's how you make a business.
I would like the people that buy my clothes to understand that for me it's one small piece of art.
I am not a commercial industry creator. I don't believe in making art to make money.
It is a myth that art has to be sold. It is not like stocking a grocery store where people fill a pushcart. Art is a product that has no apparent need. The salesperson builds the need in the mind of the buyer.
I mean, art for art's sake is ridiculous. Art is for the sake of one's needs.
I am proud being an artist who takes risks, who would walk off a cliff artistically. I won't settle for commercial reasons.
I paint for the sheer joy of painting. I have never sold any of my paintings. I'd rather give them to people for free.