I can't think of anyone who is up on evolutionary psychology and related areas who is deluded enough to be called a utopian.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Some people consider utopia to be derived from nature. For some people, utopia is the city.
Utopianism is probably a necessary social device for generating the superhuman efforts without which no major revolution is achieved.
Utopia means elsewhere.
'Utopia' is a positive and constructive program that gives people the opportunity, if you can start all over again, start from scratch and create laws and make decisions, will you be able to build a society that is better than the one we have; will it be chaos or happiness.
For other nations, utopia is a blessed past never to be recovered; for Americans it is just beyond the horizon.
Mankind, the spirit of the earth, the synthesis of individuals and peoples, the paradoxical conciliation of the element with the whole, and of unity with multitude - all these are called Utopian, and yet they are biologically necessary.
There is something very utopian about what I do. But utopia is nothing more than a truth that the world is not yet ready to hear.
Every utopia - let's just stick with the literary ones - faces the same problem: What do you do with the people who don't fit in?
It is true that I am not one of those who laugh at utopias. The utopia of today can become the reality of tomorrow. Utopias are conceived by optimistic logic which regards constant social and political progress as the ultimate goal of human endeavor; pessimism would plunge a hopeless mankind into a fresh cataclysm.
I'm a utopianist.