I always imagined that to bring an orchestra to play together is not enough for a conductor.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I mean, the great secret is that an orchestra can actually play without a conductor at all. Of course, a great conductor will have a concept and will help them play together and unify them.
The great secret is that an orchestra can actually play without a conductor at all. Of course, a great conductor will have a concept and will help them play together and unify them. But there are conductors that actually inhibit the players from playing with each other properly.
I think conductors do spend too little time with their orchestras.
A conductor can't be too arrogant with an orchestra and try to impose himself too much.
Let me say that I've never thought to conduct because the conductor has to think to the music before the orchestra. And the orchestra comes later. For me, it's terrible.
From time to time, the Vienna Philharmonic could play without a conductor because they are so good.
I think it's a very important collaboration between the conductor and the orchestra - especially when the conductor is one more member of the orchestra in the way that you are leading, but also respecting, feeling and building the same way for all the players to understand the music.
You know as I started as a shy young conductor, I always wanted to cooperate. To build up the musicians. To help them to be better than without a conductor. And sometimes young talented musicians have to be encouraged.
A conductor can do wild things which can feel forced, but if you're directing from within the orchestra, you can't do that, things have to feel natural.
There are two golden rules for an orchestra: start together and finish together. The public doesn't give a damn what goes on in between.
No opposing quotes found.