From time to time, the Vienna Philharmonic could play without a conductor because they are so good.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I mean, the great secret is that an orchestra can actually play without a conductor at all. Of course, a great conductor will have a concept and will help them play together and unify them.
The great secret is that an orchestra can actually play without a conductor at all. Of course, a great conductor will have a concept and will help them play together and unify them. But there are conductors that actually inhibit the players from playing with each other properly.
I always imagined that to bring an orchestra to play together is not enough for a conductor.
I think conductors do spend too little time with their orchestras.
A conductor can't be too arrogant with an orchestra and try to impose himself too much.
The orchestra confides in me about their music director or their conductor, and I've never seen a conductor that's been liked by everyone.
It seems always to have been difficult to have been a New York Philharmonic conductor because of the nature of New York. We are in direct competition with the great orchestras in the world who come to play in our hall or in Carnegie, and we are constantly compared. I think that 's a good thing.
Composers are not all good conductors.
I've been lucky to conduct the very best orchestras in the world: New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Berlin, the London Philharmonic.
On the other hand, when I give it closer thought, I realize I'm not enough of a dictator to conduct an orchestra because it requires a pretty awful person. When you read these biographies of famous conductors, they are all awful people who fail in their private relationships.
No opposing quotes found.