Crime butchers innocence to secure a throne, and innocence struggles with all its might against the attempts of crime.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Where all are guilty, no one is; confessions of collective guilt are the best possible safeguard against the discovery of culprits, and the very magnitude of the crime the best excuse for doing nothing.
I've always been fascinated with the stealing of innocence. It's the most heinous crime, and certainly a capital crime if there ever was one.
Our constitutionally-based criminal justice system places a high value on protecting the innocent. Among its central tenets is the idea that it is better to let a guilty person go free than to convict someone without evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Victims suggest innocence. And innocence, by the inexorable logic that governs all relational terms, suggests guilt.
Maimonides taught that it is better that 10 criminals go free than let one innocent man be executed. The Innocence Project represents that point of view.
Crimes, like virtues, are their own rewards.
Innocence is like polished armor; it adorns and defends.
Some may remember, if you have good memories, that there used to be a concept in Anglo-American law called a presumption of innocence, innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Now that's so deep in history that there's no point even bringing it up, but it did once exist.
There are crimes which become innocent and even glorious through their splendor, number and excess.
One threatens the innocent who spares the guilty.