Video just accesses international information so much more readily.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Video is universal and allows people around the world to communicate and exchange ideas.
It is impossible to effectively monitor the huge volume of videos that are out there. It is often difficult to find out who owns the copyright on individual videos. Differing copyright laws in different countries also make the whole process harder.
If you combat an international phenomenon, it is indispensable to share information internationally.
There was a time when country never used to do videos.
If you exchange information internationally, you must strengthen data protection. Those are two sides of the same coin.
All of the books in the world contain no more information than is broadcast as video in a single large American city in a single year. Not all bits have equal value.
A better quality of video is better for everyone.
The Internet, the camera cellphone and the like have not only sped up the world's information uptake, but they have cheapened that which they capture.
When it comes to video and pretty much everything else, the more personalized the content, the higher the chances of conversion.
Whereas with foreign coverage there's a much broader disconnect between you and your audience.