We shouldn't be undermining Medicare for those who need it most in order to give more tax cuts to those who need them least.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
There's a need to reform Medicare, but not a need to cut a half trillion dollars out of Medicare.
The greatest threat to Medicare is Obamacare, and we're going to stop it.
I believe we ought to subsidize some health care for the poor, but Medicare subsidizes everyone's health care.
And in terms of entitlement reforms, we have to save them from themselves, because if we don't reform social security and we don't reform Medicare, they're going to actually implode.
We ought to follow through on an idea that was first proposed by President Clinton to allow people over the age of 55 who are not eligible for Medicare into the Medicare system, at cost, and below cost for those who can't afford it. That takes care of a significant number of the people who don't have health insurance.
It worries me about our unwillingness to really address reforms and modernization in Medicare. This thing was designed 37 years ago. It has not evolved to keep pace with current medical technology.
I believe we must protect Medicare's guaranteed benefit, and I will oppose any effort to dismantle Medicare and turn it into a voucher system.
For all their scare tactics, President Obama and Democrats have no plan whatsoever to preserve Medicare for future generations - or protect it for today's seniors and those nearing retirement. They did, however, cut Medicare by $700 billion to bankroll Obamacare.
If someone really wanted to end Medicare, they wouldn't propose a reform: they would do nothing.
When people see the budget, they're going to say, 'Oh, my God, I wanted a tax cut, but I didn't know what you were going to do to health care and to Medicare and national defense.'
No opposing quotes found.