Men want children later, but women can't rely on being able to. So I'm all for scientific advances and the help they can give people.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The only difference between men and women in science is that the women have the babies. This makes it more difficult for women in science but should not be seen as a barrier, for it is merely another challenge to be overcome.
There are loads of women that don't want children. What does it matter? I'm still a woman.
I have nothing maternal in me, and men want to be mothered a lot of the time.
Any woman in any career has to think about when they have children, if they want to have children, and how it's going to affect their career.
I've always been interested in the economics of reproduction, who gets what they want when it comes to childbearing and how these days, money is a tremendous advantage.
Having children is what a woman is born for, really.
When I last looked, there weren't queues of eager guys under 40 hanging outside single ladies' doors begging them to give up work and have their babies. It takes two to tango and the same number, without medical help, to make a child.
There's a lot of technology out there to help people have children in different ways, and later in life, for better or worse.
If I were a woman, I would love to have lots of kids. But for men, I don't believe in it.
Because our generation has waited so long to have babies, we feel we've 'discovered' something that women have been doing for thousands of years. I have no illusions that I will be in the same situation as the average working mother. I'm not trying to prove anything - I just want to have kids.