It is interesting to come across people who feel that a ghost communicating via a spell-checker is less far-fetched than a software glitch.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Spell check exists for a reason.
Ghostery lets you spy on the spies in your computer. For each web page you visit, this extension uncloaks some - but not all - of the invisible tracking software that is working behind the scenes.
The hardest part of ghost writing other people's stories is capturing their voices so that it isn't you talking, it's them.
When our spelling is perfect, it's invisible. But when it's flawed, it prompts strong negative associations.
It's kind of astonishing that people trust strangers because of words they write on computer screens.
A ghost is someone who hasn't made it - in other words, who died, and they don't know they're dead. So they keep walking around and thinking that you're inhabiting their - let's say, their domain. So they're aggravated with you.
I understand that computers, which I once believed to be but a hermaphrodite typewriter-cum-filing cabinet, offer the cyber literate increased ability to communicate. I do not think this is altogether a bad thing, however it may appear on the surface.
Working with the Kinks, there always seemed to be some kind of automatic process at work. Ray and I had this telepathy happening for a long time, where one of us always knew what the other could do with something.
Machines aren't replacing proofreaders at all. Copy editors, who proofread and much, much more, use spellcheck as a tool but read every word that appears in the paper.
All my life, I never realized you could have a conversation with a ghost.
No opposing quotes found.