In today's interdependent world, a threat to one becomes a menace to all. And no state can defeat these challenges and threats alone.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The thought of security bears within it an essential risk. A state which has security as its sole task and source of legitimacy is a fragile organism; it can always be provoked by terrorism to become more terroristic.
Two dangers constantly threaten the world: order and disorder.
Global security can be formed or threatened by heads of state whose wisdom, folly and obsessions shape global events. But often it is the security practitioners, those rarely in the headlines but whose craft and energy quietly break new ground, who keep us safe or put us in peril.
Terrorism gravely threatens international peace and security, and as a solution, the power and apparent finality of force are seductive.
So not only do we need to deal with threats as they emerge, we have to be thinking in anticipation of future threats, and the things we do have to be things that enable the system to continue to work.
Abatement in the hostility of one's enemies must never be thought to signify they have been won over. It only means that one has ceased to constitute a threat.
The world is ruled by violence, or at least the imminent threat of violence. It always has been.
The real threat comes from terrorism.
But the threat posed by the radical Islamists represents an unusual conflict, unlike any experienced by our nation before: we face an enemy that is not a state.
A State in the grip of neo-colonialism is not master of its own destiny. It is this factor which makes neo-colonialism such a serious threat to world peace.
No opposing quotes found.