It's not a film-maker's job to explain his technique, but to tell his story the best way he can.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It's a director's job to tell a story and he's very well versed in telling stories with a bit of comedy in them and keeping the pace of the movie right and that's exactly what he did. He was observant of a world he didn't understand but he told a wonderful story.
I have always believed that directing a film is like telling a story. You have to tell it well so that it is appreciated.
The thing is, as a film director, you're essentially alone: You have to tell a story primarily through pictures, and only you know the film you see in your head.
Film-makers must decide what story to tell and how to tell it.
As a filmmaker, the only way that I understand how to make a film is holistically.
I think film, to me, as a director, is about telling a story.
I think the most experimental way to a film is to tell the story the traditional way, because everyone is doing the other thing.
Film is a dramatised reality and it is the director's job to make it appear real... an audience should not be conscious of technique.
As a filmmaker and film student, I think it's really interesting to hear what a director did and how they figured out how to do things.
I think that when you're making a story... that's based on somebody, the filmmaker has his duty to do his research.