I guess I'm trying to write stuff that I, as a viewer, would connect to.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If after you read something, you connect with it, you want to do it.
I write 'Broad City,' so I connect it to me.
I write the kind of stuff I'd like to watch.
The same basic tools we've used for thousands of years to connect with people, to draw them in and to hold their attention will always work, even if we're telling our stories 140 characters at a time.
Once I found this possibility to use Twitter and Facebook and my blog to connect to my readers, I'm going to use it, to connect to them and to share thoughts that I cannot use in the book.
I wanted to communicate and connect. I simply didn't seem able to do it.
In library science school, back in the years of glowing green non-graphical screens and protocols called Archie and Veronica, I wrote Internet documentation.
I can't write without a reader. It's precisely like a kiss - you can't do it alone.
My goal is to make the viewer a little bit smarter.
I can connect with whoever I want to connect with in the world. And I can also write my own script. I don't have to follow rules. I can sort of just be unconventional.
No opposing quotes found.