The moment that one person in an argument claims to be God, dialogue and debate become impossible.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Nobody gets argued all the way into becoming a believer on the sheer basis of logic and reason. That requires a leap of faith.
Once you believe that God is speaking directly to you, there is no discussion.
Arguing that God doesn't exist would be like people in the 10th century arguing that germs and microbes didn't exist because they couldn't see them.
That deep emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God.
You don't need the 'voice of God' commentary. Instead, by juxtaposing contradictory or confirmatory witnesses and archive material, your point of view becomes obvious.
I tend not to argue about things that I don't believe in.
As set forth by theologians, the idea of 'God' is an argument that assumes its own conclusions, and proves nothing.
There cannot be a God because if there were one, I could not believe that I was not He.
Nobody talks so constantly about God as those who insist that there is no God.
The moment we want to believe something, we suddenly see all the arguments for it, and become blind to the arguments against it.