Arguing that God doesn't exist would be like people in the 10th century arguing that germs and microbes didn't exist because they couldn't see them.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If God exists, what objection can he have to saying so?
I can't prove that God doesn't exist, but I'd much rather live in a universe without one.
Don't be misled by those who claim God doesn't exist, because He does.
If there's a God, and we have all this evidence that there's evolution, but He created the world only 6,000 years ago - what is the best and most logical explanation to reconcile those two things? I came up with - He came up with it, of course - that all things are fakeable.
The moment that one person in an argument claims to be God, dialogue and debate become impossible.
Nobody talks so constantly about God as those who insist that there is no God.
I think the appropriate response for a physicist is: 'I do not find the concept of God very interesting, because I cannot test it.'
Even if it were proven that God didn't exist, Religion would still be Saintly and Divine.
Except for a God who sits down after the universe begins, all other gods conflict with the assumptions of science.
As set forth by theologians, the idea of 'God' is an argument that assumes its own conclusions, and proves nothing.