To shut off coal, or to say you can't have further coal development, I think is the wrong way to go.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We don't want to leave the coal in the ground, and that necessarily is going to involve better technology with regard to clean uses of coal.
If you want improvements in coal, you've got to keep people in the business.
Coal is cheap, but up to what extent are we going to allow coal plants to operate?
The coal mining industry is very destructive and it doesn't have to be.
You have to recognize what the markets are doing, what the rules and regulations are doing, and all the more reasons that we've got to find some more solutions in particular with coal.
I don't think you have a choice but to pull CO2 back that has already made it out, or is about to make it out, because we are not overnight shutting down all the coal plants.
The government is shutting down the coal industry, they say it's cheaper to draw nuclear power off the French grid and cheaper to buy coal from Colombia.
The closing of ash basins is really part of decommissioning a coal plant.
Coal is responsible for as much atmospheric carbon dioxide as other fossil fuels combined and it still has far greater reserves. We must stop using it.
No one wants to stoke coal if he can regulate an oil valve instead.
No opposing quotes found.