So the danger of conservative judicial activism has been averted for another year. Stay tuned.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Of course, conservatives always claim to be against judicial activism.
I have always thought that term limits for Justices sound good until you really give the issue some thought.
There is a danger to judicial independence when people have no understanding of how the judiciary fits into the constitutional scheme.
Though the critics are loud and the temptations to join them may be many, mark me down too as a believer that the traditional account of the judicial role Justice Scalia defended will endure.
It's hard not to have a big year at the Supreme Court.
This is the most historic moment in Supreme Court history in our lifetime, no question about it. These are justices who are going to serve for decades.
I think I present an overwhelming case that these five justices were up to no good, and they deliberately set out to hand the election to George Bush.
Our runaway judiciary is badly in need of restraint by Congress.
You want to know what judicial activism is? Judicial activism is judges imposing their policy preferences on the words of the Constitution.
Conservative voters increasingly understand that the one legacy a president can leave is his judicial appointments.
No opposing quotes found.