No inanimate object is ever fully determined by the laws of physics and chemistry.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Inanimate objects can be classified scientifically into three major categories; those that don't work, those that break down and those that get lost.
But even physics cannot be defined from an atomic topography.
In physics, all can you do is predict the consequences of physical laws.
But a science is exact to the extent that its method measures up to and is adequate to its object.
Indeed, every true science has for its object the determination of certain phenomena by means of others, in accordance with the relations which exist between them.
That's absolutely correct and in addition to that life just isn't an accident of the laws of physics. There's a long list of experiments that suggest just the opposite.
Natural objects, for example, must be experienced before any theorizing about them can occur.
That is the essence of science: ask an impertinent question, and you are on the way to a pertinent answer.
There is no physical law precluding particles from being organised in ways that perform even more advanced computations than the arrangements of particles in human brains.
The object of pure physics is the unfolding of the laws of the intelligible world; the object of pure mathematics that of unfolding the laws of human intelligence.