When it comes to work, there is a fear factor around meritocracy. People are afraid of being openly judged. However, when you know what you are being measured against, it's empowering.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Meritocracy is a good thing. Whenever possibly, people should be judged based on their work and results, not superficial qualities.
I want my work to be judged, not me.
You don't need to know someone personally to be able to discern whether their work is high quality or not. The idea of a meritocracy is that it's what they do, not who they are.
It makes common sense to be managed by results and it's freeing to know you are in control of your own destiny. I'm so passionate about this because I have seen how merit-based judgment has helped create individual successes and yield a better system for everyone.
I do not need to hear how I am judged by others. I know by myself if I can be satisfied or not with my work.
I am a believer in people succeeding on merit.
When it comes to meritocracy and diversity, the symbolic is real. And that means that simple actions that reduce bias, such as blind resume or application screening, are a double win: they reduce implicit bias and they help communicate our commitment to meritocracy.
I want to be judged on my own merits.
I'm much more comfortable in a meritocracy and in reward for good work as opposed to a political environment, where I feel like all of that can be confused.
In the workplace, employees should be judged on their merit and hard work and not on aspects that are irrelevant to their performance.
No opposing quotes found.