A movie as specific as 'Heathers,' which took place in a specific time and specific place and in which many of the characters got killed off, I never thought it made sense to see a sequel.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm all in favor of people - myself included - going into the same territory if there's something that can be done with it. But if somebody says, 'Make a sequel to 'Heathers',' I feel like, no, someone should make a good movie that's a dark, satirical comedy that has that sensibility.
I think a sequel is a waste of money and time. I think movies should illuminate new stories.
I love 'Heathers,' and I loved doing that movie. I'm very proud of it, so if it gets brought up, I'm happy.
The only reason ever to make a sequel is to spend more time with the characters that people love: to tell more of their story.
I didn't really want to do another sequel. I go to those movies, and I just sort of enjoy them like a viewer.
It's always scary when you're doing a sequel to a film, because you don't want to just repeat the first film in a different location like most sequels. You want to do something totally different, and something that actually expands the world of the main character.
As we all know, sequels can be tricky.
To do a sequel is so weird, you don't really think about it.
You never know in a movie if it's going to be a sequel, but right now I'm proud of what we produced.
I think sequels are fine if there's a story, so I think when there is a property that is worthy of a sequel, it could very well happen!