Is there Gawker ethics? I mean, I guess there's Gawker ethics. It's a dangerous thing to talk about.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I can't go on Gawker. I actually think the writing is really funny, but there is a chance that somebody is undercutting me.
It's no wonder that new ventures such as The Daily look first to Gawker Media when staffing up. We should not wait for a poaching expedition to pay someone what they deserve. I apologize if that has been the case and will do better in 2012.
One of Dawkins' major gripes is against religion. I am in total agreement on that one. I abhor religion.
The reason I want to show shocking things is that they always pose an ethical question.
I think ethics is always there; it's not always a very thoughtful or reflective ethics.
The ethics of journalism are one thing. Another thing is the ethics of business.
Ethics to me is very important.
Nothing I write ever has a moral. If it seems to a reader that there is one, that is unintentional.
The most important ethical issues and the most difficult ones are the human ones because a reporter has enormous power to hurt people.
You can't be a part-time Richard Dawkins.