I think people always assume that every team has great intangibles, and that's not necessarily right.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Everyone always says you have to be on the best team, the team that wins. Oh, no, no, no. I disagree with that.
It takes a lot of people to make a winning team. Everybody's contribution is important.
I think there is a lot of good in making the All-Star Team. People look at your career a little bit differently.
A lot of players think the game is all about individual performances when it's really all about a team game.
I think I know now, each team is different, each player is different. I don't believe everybody has got to be the same.
But the best teams I've encountered have one important thing in common: their team structure and processes cover a full range of distinct competencies necessary for success.
You can't always have the best team. It's always a compromise.
The way a team plays as a whole determines its success. You may have the greatest bunch of individual stars in the world, but if they don't play together, the club won't be worth a dime.
You've got to be extremely careful, because you could be with a great team, and you could be the product of a great team. There are some players that stand out despite the teams that they play on, and there are some players that are good because of the team that they're with.
I, most talented players don't always succeed. Some don't even make the team. It's more what's inside.
No opposing quotes found.