A lot of my movies have come to be thought about only years after the fact, and I'm sad about that but also happy about it in a way, as it's given them longevity.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I feel that film is inevitably the medium of the future. It has been for years, decades, but more so now than ever.
I just hope that some of the movies I'm in are still welcome years from now.
These things have a life of there own and never existed when I was growing up certainly worrying when one would get made. It's kind of amazing how that one movie kept living through all these years.
Having a movie that lasts and makes your image imprinted into the history of cinema, it's very positive.
You know you've been around when they start to remake your own movies when you're still alive.
Sometimes when you make a film you can go away for three months and then come back and live your life. But this struck a much deeper chord. I don't have the ability yet to speak about it in an objective.
Movies tie things up in an arbitrary length of time, but I have always liked things that aren't fully realised.
I think as an actor you're lucky to have any film take on a life of its own long after it's left the theater.
You've got to believe as a filmmaker that if a movie's good enough, it's going to survive; and if it's not, well, it won't.
Obviously, I'm very happy when one of my films becomes a blockbuster. However, after a point, I want to switch off. I have learnt to just move on. Too much pressure can make you wrong.
No opposing quotes found.