Washington still refuses to provide evidence to support the claims in 1990 that a huge Iraqi military build-up on the Saudi border justified war.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A lot of folks are still demanding more evidence before they actually consider Iraq a threat. For example, France wants more evidence. And you know I'm thinking, the last time France wanted more evidence they rolled right through Paris with the German flag.
Whether or not Americans supported George W. Bush, they could not avoid learning about Abu Ghraib.
But there is scant evidence to tie Saddam to terrorist organizations, and even less to the Sept. 11 attacks.
Things are difficult enough about Iraq without the Federal Government suppressing the truth about Iraq.
Despite recent media reports that have clouded, or even misrepresented, the facts, there is compelling evidence that al-Qaida and Iraq have been linked for more than a decade.
We could never verify that there was any Iraqi authority, direction and control, complicity with al Qaeda for 9/11 or any operational act against America. Period.
Even now there is no evidence that anyone involved in the Nixon operation was going to threaten us.
The Iraq war was not necessary.
I still believe to some degree that Iraq had WMD.
The American claim that the bombing of North Vietnam was directed against military targets does not withstand direct investigation.